27
May
10

Fear and Loathing at Cleopatra Mountain Farmhouse

What we were expecting.

Cleopatra Mountain Farmhouse has developed an entire mythology of it’s own when it comes to destinations for food in the Natal Midlands. Its often spoken about in glowing terms and time and time again it has been recommended to me by various people, not least of which my friend, a well heeled sophisticate who has eaten in some of the best places in the country, if not all of them. His parents, even better heeled are accustomed to traveling around the world and staying at the best venues along with sampling the best fare from London to Bombay, would be our hosts.

So you can imagine that when they invited me to dinner, and a night at their “farm”, a small luxury fiefdom the size of a small country in the midlands, along with dinner at Cleopatra’s, I jumped at the invitation. My friend had eaten there on three other occasions and he enthused about the event all the way up there. He stopped me from eating biltong from a farm store, denied me the fabulous cheeses in the fridge and held me back at lunch. Hell he even stopped me from eating the bread rolls they placed on the table before our meal. “Don’t eat “, he insisted, “save yourself.”

So, fair to say that my expectations were high, very high. So high that even a dreadful and slightly historically incorrect self-indulgent babble from a hotel manager presented as a lecture before dinner could not dampen my high spirits. My heart first began to sink when the chef addressed us on her menu for the night. She gushed over her food like a lovesick sycophant on crack. Everything was “fresh”, and “delightful” all her flavours were “intense” and she insisted, after describing each dish to us like we were teenagers, t hat it was “a lovely dish with wonderful fresh flavours, and you are very lucky to be having it, and I hope you enjoy it.”

Each time the little girl repeated the mantra, six times in all, my expectations lowered. I was amazed that a girl so young could call herself a chef, let alone have such an inflated opinion of her culinary expertise. I realized there and then that this was no chef-patron venue, and that all I had heard about Richard Poynton, the chef at Cleopatra, was in vain, for he had deserted us for a recent graduate of Matric, he wasn’t even in the Hotel that night.

His pubescent sidekick continued to speak to us as if we had just began eating food. She explained that the main course would be a confit of duck. “Confit is a way of cooking duck in its own fat, so its very tender and it’s a lovely dish with wonderful fresh flavours, and you are very lucky to be having it, and I hope you enjoy it.”

Of course she was wrong. Confit is about storing duck,  and preserving it in it’s fat, a step they leave out at Cleopatra, and a vital step too, because its while the duck cools in the fat that the flavours are reabsorbed… but I’m splitting hairs, that’s for 5 star dining establishments.

After the school lesson, a la student teacher, we were ushered into the dining room.

As we waited for one of two waiters to pour our wine, that they had recommended, a dreadfully sour pinot noir, we plotted to choose our own wine for the next bottle. I held back on the bread, and waited, and waited, and waited and then dashed down to the cellar to pick a better bottle (they have no wine list – you see), bored with waiting my friend and his father joined me a little later and we decided on a bottle of Rubicon, defeated by the  lack of good choice. A waiter came and found us, our first bit was up, we rushed back.

There it sat, on a plate, no bigger than a Kruger rand and not much thicker. The girl-chef had called it a tower of apple and Brie, topped with sultanas and almonds. It was at best a tablespoon of apple squeezed around a slither of under ripe Brie with a smattering of almonds and raisins. If the presentation was a let down, the flavour was, well a towering flop. In fact the almond and sultana garnish were the best part.

I hit the bread.

Richard was nowhere to be seen.

I eyed my friend across the table, he blushed, and said “so they missed it, its not bad though, trust me, it will get better.”

His mother smiled a wry smile and said, “ I certainly hope so.”

We chatted over our empty plates for 20 minutes, and the bread disappeared.

We left the pinot in our glasses and opened the Rubicon. It was so much better.

Then the soup arrived. Three tablespoons of it, in a strange white bowl that looked like an ashtray. I demolished mine. Sweet corn soup, nicely made, but already luke warm. I thought to myself, so much bowl for so little soup. We all decided that we liked the soup, and my friend muttered something about the tomato soup he had last time.

20 minutes more, we stared at our empty plates.

The next course was a sort of corse potato and salmon fish cake. It had been billed as a Mediterranean dish, topped with a tiger prawn and nestling on a courgette pasta, with a balsamic reduction, the cakes were supposed to be lightly coated and fried until crisp, it would be we were promised , ““a lovely dish with wonderful fresh flavours, and you are very lucky to be having it, and I hope you enjoy it.”

What it was, was a bland conglomeration of potato and fish, pressed together and fried, it almost fell apart as it arrived, on top of a julienne of courgette. When I wondered did julienne veg become pasta? The tiger prawn was more of a tabby cat prawn and the balsamic reduction was so strong and acidic it obliterated what little flavour there was in the dry little fish koek.

In a word… dreadful

The obligatory twenty minutes of empty plates happened.

Then, the main.

The tablespoon theme continued as a theme, with one tablespoon of shredded duck in an over sweet sauce placed on top of massive potato gunge masquerading as, I think, a potato fondant ( who knows), floating in a puddle of creamed spinach and decorated  with 6 equidistant cubes of butternut, interrupted by 6 tiny dice of feta. The duck was topped with a piece of puff pastry, the same white colour as the potato, duck burger on a puddle of yuck.

I’m not even going to tell you how the spinach feta and butternut and confit duck clashed, the dish was worse conceived that executed .

A disaster.

We were about to get the bill and go when the pudding arrived.

It reminded me of those terrible mousses they serve in champagne glasses on cruise ships for geriatrics, you know the ones that double as display and food. The dessert was a gelatinous chocolate “soufflé”…  It was a lot of things, it was certainly no soufflé, and I dare say barely chocolate.

Thank God it was small, even so I was unable to finish it.

But, dear reader, the best was to come last as our chef bounded out the kitchen to ask  how we enjoyed our meal.

“Mediocre,”, I said.

“Perhaps you would prefer a toasted cheese and tomato!” she shot back.

Touché!

(Our  meal cost R2250-00 for four )

RATING:

Anne Steven’s loves this place by the way, you can read what I think of her reviews here:

anne stevens and the hunt for intergalactic “veges” or the culinary faux pas of durban’s own jabba the hut

27
May
10

Welcome to the new Censorship – Islam successfully draws a line on our freedoms!

We shook hands, laughed and came to an agreement as only South Africans can.” – Iqbal Jassat United Muslim Front.

The week began with fire works, and you may, dear reader, have thought that the events unfolding from the Mail and Guardian publication of the prophet of Islam were a real example of freedom of speech, here on the shores of the rainbow nation. There were last minute attempts to use the legal system to gag the right to freedom of speech, which failed, then there were death threats and there were rumblings of the press in South Africa finally making a stand for freedom of speech.

With the High Court of South Africa backing the free speech rights of the South African citizen and Zapiro standing firm against threats and intimidation from vocal muslims and loony bloggers across the dark empire of Islam, perhaps this would be a defining moment -it was heady stuff.

And then in a moment free speech lost, or rather sold out.

After meeting with the United Muslim Front the Mail and Guardian capitulated. According to todays Daily News it was an “Amicable” solution, reached at the end of a “robust” meeting.

And what was this solution ?

Ha ! An unequivocal apology and the newspaper calling its exercising of its free speech rights , “regrettable” and a promise not to do it again !

The UMF was delighted (no doubt) saying,” common sense had prevailed.”

Just what common sense prevailed is anyone’s guess, perhaps the Mail and Guardian did not want to have a 747 flown into its head office. Who knows ?

The gentle folk from the UMF also wanted to assure South Africans that they “…did not want to curtail or censor the media, but rather draw a line on religious sensitivities.”

Dear God man, if the M&G were going to give up this easily why did they bother trying at all ?

So dear reader, the courts be damned, the constitution be rubbished and be afraid, be very afraid, your rights got trashed today by a bunch of jihading lunatics in frocks, and our free press said “Sorry!”

Eish!

24
May
10

Showing their colours – The deep hypocrisy of “moderate” Islam.

Well, dear reader, whilst moderate Islam was sending homosexuals to jail in northern Africa, much to the approval of so called Moderate Muslims all over the world, some of whom were a little nonplussed at the “leniency” of the sentence, Zapiro was drawing the prophet.

Oh yes, and before you could say “homosexuals are dogs who deserve death”, they were up in arms about being insulted, and moderate muslims (excuse the oxymoron) were screeching about their rights.

One of them put it this way:

“A cartoonist makes fun of Prophet Muhammad (Peace be on him) and a court rules in his favor citing ‘freedom of expression’. Welcome to our insane world and the new definition of the word ‘freedom’ which seeks to absolve the one who exercises that freedom from the consequences of his actions. Effectively what this means is that when we exercise our freedoms, the rest of the world can go to hell. How many of you want to live in such a world? If you don’t then you’d better consider doing something about those who seek to change your world for you. At the very least raise your voice and speak out against unbridled freedom without responsibility – which until now used to be called anarchy.”  - http://letterdash.com/yawarbaig/freedom-of-expression-or-freedom-without-responsibility

But you don’t have to look far to see all of the apologists for moderate Islam jumping through hoops to rely on their so called rights. Homosexuals you see have no rights and can be killed. Muslims however have even more rights than anyone else, and how very dare we challenge them.

Islam exercising its rights.

The only question I have, is “Could they really be this stupid or do they just think we are ?”

Eish!

19
May
10

The Great South African World Cup Security Baboon Show

Yes, dear reader, its true. Militant Islam has us in their sights. Why, you ask ? Well, so they can blow us up. And yes they are planning to use our shores for their next Jihad. Does it matter to these endlessly jihading, desert savage ideologues that our nation has always opposed Israel ? No. Does it matter that senior members of our government regularly rub shoulders with the luminary emissaries of Islam like our designer sunglass clad doyen of African unity, the ever present dimwitted leader of Libya ? No! Does it matter that we, South Africa, thanks to Mr Deedat, are the biggest exporter of the Koran in the World? No! Does it matter that women wearing dustbin bags regularly wander freely around our streets or that at 5 pm every night we get to hear the screeching wails of Imams in mosques with public address systems ? No!

This is not the USA, ladies and gents. This is not an invading country. No siree, we don’t occupy anywhere, other than Lesotho. In fact my town is home to the biggest mosque in the Southern Hemisphere. On top of all this, to add insult to injury, our government regularly supports Muslim and Arab issues. They too are sycophantic about Palestine and deeply anti-semitic, oops sorry, opposing Israel in favour of  Islam is not anti-semetic, its anti Zionist … silly me. Zionists are Jews who want a country, and thats well, just wrong. How very dare they.

This is not Mohammed, that would be illegal, this is his cousin Mohammed's son Mohammed Izaak.

Our constitution protects their religion, right down to letting them regularly print their religious tracts, demanding sharia law, dustbin bag fashion for women and the death of homos, and cartoonists and of course George Bush, from down town Durban no less. And let me tell you, our hate speech laws prevent us from making fun of Mohammed… blessed be his name ( i have to say that so that I don’t end up in the equality court.)

This matters nada !!

Downtown Durban South Africa

And who can blame them ? I mean what an opportunity for global terror.

Let me explain, before my public stoning:

The latest threat to South Africa has been uncovered by, guess who… the Americans. According to the Daily News here in Durban tonight the plot was to get back at Dutch people who might be at the world cup. Their crime? Drawing his holiness (blessed be his name) Mo!

Thats right, forget New York, its now Johannesburg. Our crime ? Letting the Dutch watch football.

Silly us !

What should alarm you is the response from the monkeys who run our security, and I quote :

“He (Vish Nadoo – police spokesman) said the only information South African officials had was from media reports.” – Daily News 19 May 2010

Despite this all tonight E News channel led with 6 other stories. The pink elephant was hardly mentioned.

Welcome to the baboon show.

19
May
10

celebrating 350 years of fine winemaking in the cape of good hope or filling the world with their faux, methode cap classique.

This piece was written on the anniversary of the Wine Industry in Cape Town, while the nonsense about 350 years of fine winemaking was plastered all over our TV screens. I republish it here, because strangely enough, even though it is not on the front page, and languishing in archives, it is suddenly the fourth most read piece of the day, and has been now for a few days.

For Frank.

Cape Town is not just a city in Africa, dear reader; it is so very much more. The fairest Cape in all the world is now one of the biggest theme park attractions in the galaxy. A giant, global ethnic theme park, perched on the southern tip of Africa, under the shade of a famous mountain, Cape Town is to Africa, what Disney World is to America, complete with imaginary rides of all kinds, it is a fantasy of faux to tickle you tastes and tantalize your mind with spectacular delusion after delusion.

At the top of the list of attractions, and currently advertised on rags around the globe, is Cape Town’s premier fun fair ride, and what a ride it is, now dressed up as 350 years of fine wine making.

That’s correct, 350 years, no less.

The Cape would have you believe that its been making wines of great international acclaim since January 1650, and for a small sum you can wind your way along the rollercoaster known as the Cape Wine route, and celebrate this magnificent achievement in true European style.

Now, those of you who paid attention at school may remember that wine was brought to Cape Town, by a certain Dutchman who landed here, no doubt with casks of the stuff exactly 350 years ago. Presumably this band of entrepreneurs managed to plant vineyards, mature wine, bottle it and start the wine industry in a couple months, a feat well worth celebrating.

But why split hairs?

This is how, you see, a pig, farm founded in the sixteen hundreds, gets to market its bottles with the byline, since 1678, despite the fact that grapes only began to grow there in the early 1970’s.The great inheritance of years of viticulture, stolen by public relations fraud, and regurgitated with darn right bloody cheek by the Cape wine industry.

Consequently, a pig farm vintage from Paarl, can sell for just a shade more than a burgundy, and a short stroll down the wine isle at Sainsbury’s, will reveal bottle after bottle of Cape Chateau de Doos, boxing in the same price brackets as real wines from both the old and the new world, and why, a bottle of Moet, costs less than Hamilton Russell’s Pinot Noir at my local Spar.

True to form, the history of winemaking in the Cape is shrouded in mystery, with wine farms being the sole custodians of the information, which they manipulate with the skill of David Copperfield.

According to their website, the oldest wine farm is, Groot Constantia, whose claim to fame is over 320 years of history, which applies also to the location of the Quick spar in Gardens.

The actual wine industry is harder to pin point, but it certainly was not before the late 1700’s that they even sold grape juice to the locals. As for a fine wine industry of international repute, it was only in 1885 that, in the words of the official mouthpiece of the farm, that “. . theproject was expected to become commercially viable….{with the appointment of } …Baron Carl von Babo.”

By this time, what passed for Cape Vintage was nothing more than gape juice with added brandy. Fortified wine, like Cinzano Bianco, or Port but not quite as subtle and certainly not on the tables of the various royal households of Europe, as the Cape bullshit machine would have you believe.

According to the Groot Constantia website, it was a man calle Baron Carl von Babo, from the then famous viticultural school at Klosterneuberg in Austria, who started the wine industry, not Jan van Riebeek, and at their very farm. (www.grootconstantia.co.za)

By all accounts Baron Babo, despite his luminary credentials, was a mediocre wine maker, no doubt he blamed the soil and the climate though. Even the savvy viticulturists from Constantia admit that , “…the quality of wines produced at Groot Constantia during the years of Van Babo and Mayer left much to be desired.”

Curiously enough though, the famous Klosterneuberg was only founded in 1860, and its director from that time on was one Baron August William von Babo. Not Carl.

Just who Carl Babo is , is unclear. There is no reference to this man from Klosterneuberg. Did they invent him at Constantia ? Perhaps August was his daddy. If in fact he was August, then it’s curious that no mention is made of a trip to SA to start the wine industry.

Could he have been the first viticultural con man at the Cape?

Now, to be fair, these sorts of oversights do happen, but what is most curious is that the only biography I can find of any Baron von Babo from Klosterneuberg at www.economy-point.org/a/august-william-of-babo.html , has him running Klosterneuberg until 1893, and not a mention, outside of the Cape of what Constania’s spin doctors credit him with, “…propagating the first natural table wine in the Cape.”

Wow!

Let me cut and paste the passage:

“Groot Constantia, the mother of wine estates in South Africa, was sold to the Cape Government for £5 275 at a public auction in 1885. The purpose was that the estate should become a model for viticulture purposes, and the project was expected to become commercially viable.

The first person appointed to manage this task was Baron Carl von Babo, who came from the famous viticultural school at Klosterneuberg in Austria. Although Von Babo was only marginally successful, he must be honored for producing and propagating the first natural table wine in the Cape at Groot Constantia (until now fortified wines had mostly been produced). Von Babo was succeeded in 1889 by Herr C Mayer from the German viticultural school at Geisenheim. “

Shock, Horror, Gasp !?!

So by their own pen, fine wine dates only to 1885, and produced by a man unrecorded in history, but for the books of Groot Constantia.

The long and short of Constantia’s history by their own pen, is that real wine, never mind fine, was not being produced until well into the 1880’s…. a far cry from the 320 years of prestige they claim from their website atwww.grootconstantia.co.za/11/overview.

So even if the elusive Baron Carl was real, the wine industry is at very best having its 125th birthday this year, a desperate far cry from the 350 years of fine winemaking tradition that they would have us believe.

Sies man !

No matter to the Cape, for you see, there in that new French Riviera, the elite who fled from the New (very black) South Africa never notice such details dhal-ing, much like their feted mayor, our Tin Pot Lady of Shame, Mrs. Zille, delusion is on every menu, with not the slightest hint of shame.

Other fantastic rides the shameless charlatans of epicure in the Cape have for you include, Fine olive oil from farms that have been growing olives for less time than the average pregnancy, at three times the price of real Italian and Spanish brands, with real heritage.

Gourmet shops with shelves of local copycat cheeses masquerading under cutesy names like cape-o-zola, Parmigianino tablemountaino, raclete du fanchoek, and wildebeest mozzarella.

Yes, there is no end to euro imitating in the cape, Durbanville Foi Gras, Paarl Parma Ham, Paddafontein Caviar, and my personal favorite The Kalahari Truffle. Each and every one passed off, passed on, reviewed and celebrated in this our Gourmet Kingdom of the counterfeit.

No wonder the French stopped them from calling bubbly Cape wine, Champagne.

The Cape accepted that one, I suppose you can’t win them all.

So, no more Methode Champanoise!

Yes, it’s now Methode Cap Classique!

Which is French for: Classic Bullshit, Cape Style.

Postscript

www.grootconstantia.co.za/11/overview.

19
May
10

Well Bully for You Mr Cayzer

I, like tens of thousands of young people, worked hard to get the Conservatives out of the 1997 election.” -Jon Cayzer

Curiously enough, but in true “liberal” colours the DA has taken a swipe at,of all people,the British electorate. Some DA hack who now runs transport in Cape Town, and is about to go to Harvard to study, no doubt handing over his brand, spanking new job to someone else, has produced an article praising Helen Zille (surprise) and granting the DA, the mantle of success that he is convinced Nick Clegg was after.

He’s been betrayed, you see. By people in the UK who don’t share his values.

Damn them!!

This little piece of self congratulatory rubbish languishes on the pages of my Natal Mercury this morning, and lords the “huge” success of the DA as an example to the obviously less sophisticated Clegg by offering pithy advice from the hallowed halls of DA power, and comparing Clegg to the IFP.

Now before you fall off your chair laughing, it gets worse. Mr Cayzer suggests that the Conservatives have marginalized “liberal values’ by co-opting the Liberal Democrats through trickery under the guise of compromise and cheated the British out of a real option for them to have a real party like the DA in South Africa, a la Zille.

Its curious, but the intellectual capital behind Mr Cayzer’s piece  revealed in this quote

“…the coalition is a betrayal of the NOBEL battle to ENTRENCH liberal values in British society.”

Shock, horror and gasp.

Yes, once again its obvious, liberals are right, their values are correct and they should be entrenched, by battle if necessary. Nothing about the will of the electorate. Its simple you see, people must be told what they want by liberals, who hold the moral high ground, and that battle is NOBEL.

What rubbish. Mr Cayzer ignores the most fundamental of his so called values. The one incidentally that is also a right, a fundamental right. The right to vote. Now that the vote has swung, and the outcome is not to Mr Cayzer and his ilk, its a betrayal.

Mr Cayzer fears that the Conservative party will “revert to type.”

I certainly hope so.

17
May
10

Excusing Islam the New York Times Way

Robert Write, the New York Times Columnist has a bone to pick with Daniel Pipes. He thinks that Islam is not the cause of terrorist acts, like the recent car bombing in New York. Not only does Write have another soultion, he sarcastically posits another universe :

“In the universe I’m positing, the following scenario is conceivable:

A Pakistani guy moves to America, goes to college, gets a job, starts a family. He grows unhappy. Maybe he’s having financial problems (though I’m skeptical, for reasons outlined by Charles Lane here, that Shahzad’s home foreclosure actually signifies as much); or maybe the problem is just that he doesn’t find his social niche. And maybe he was a bit unstable to begin with — which would make it harder to find his niche and might intensify his reaction to not finding it.

Anyway, for whatever reason, he feels alienated in America. He stays in touch with people and events back home in Pakistan, and this gives him another reason to dislike America: American drones are firing missiles into Pakistan, sometimes killing women and children.”

From there its a jump, skip and a hop to the conclusion …. complexity of reasons, a myriad of issues, difficult circumstances are what makes a terrorist, not Islam !!!!

No, never Islam.

I’m afraid he misses the point, and badly too, because, its not about what led the disgruntled nut job to the feet of Allah and his Jihad answer, but the fact that Islam provides a moral framework for the terrorist act.

Why all this obfuscation of the issue ?

13
Jul
09

President Obama, Doves and Eagles or, The desire for peace is not a weakness, it might just be realpolitik.

Obama and the War on Terror Part 2 of 6.

americanflageagleThe conservative press and its commentators in the United States have been up in arms since the day Obama was made president. Well, the truth is they had been up in arms long before that, but for our purposes, they were pretty much frothing at the mouth, by the time he took office.

The European and world media, were, however almost sycophantic in the praise they lauded upon the United States. After two terms of the hugely unpopular Bush administration, Obama was hailed as a new chance, a change for the better. IT was all but a new dawn for humanity.

You, may, dear reader, have thought that the European press had abandoned its highbrow attitude to all things American, and eased its anti American sentiment. You would too, be very wrong. What the European’s like about Obama, is his universality, in a sense he is more palatable to European sentiment than McCain, or many preceding American presidents.

It is my humble opinion that, this is an incorrect perspective, however widely held. I think Obama is starting to look as American as apple pie, and the truth is that the racial component, and the ivy leagueness, with its resultant euro centricity is waning.

Regardless of style or race, Mr. Obama is shaping up to be a man of ideals and ideas. The simple truth here, dear reader, is, whether or not you agree with him, you have to admit, the man is an extraordinary intellect, a formidable opponent, a clearly defined human being and a consummate politician.

It’s great stuff all round.flag america

While Americans, still guilty, and reeling from the sort of isolation that was imposed, unconsciously on the red white and blue, by the world media and the European mouthpieces thereof, are feeling that the tide has turned and America is back in the good books of the world, I still fear that it is honeymoon stuff.

Already the rumblings of discontent are being heard at the G20 regarding Obama and his policies for the reconstruction of the Global economy. The olive branch is as it were, still in the hand of the US president. The deeply held dislike of the European press for America, may well be in recession, but I predict that it will show its ugly head, steeped as it is in historical and unjustifiable contempt for the American Dream.

Oh, yes, I think Obama is all about the American Dream. I can hear my European readers switching off their modems as I write this. I have previously considered this pinnacle point in anti-American sentiment before. I still hold that the European press looks upon anyone who trades in the currency of hope, with contempt.

 

Obama is full of hope. He speaks of hope, he speaks of the shortcomings of the system and he almost always does so in relation to his plan to turn that back around and forge the American Dream.

The American Dream, scourge of euro intellectuals and barmaids in down town Warsaw. The American Dream, not yet accomplished, much maligned and scoffed. The American Dream, now revitalized, and with a new face, and a new voice, in new circumstances, about to yet again, echo as a clarion call across the oceans.

Of course, the Europeans simply scorn the dream, the real haters of it wear dustbin bags and dishcloths, and emigrate there with the sole purpose of blowing it all to hell and gone.

This simple threat has motivated some in the conservative camp to claim that Obama is some kind of reincarnated Chamberlain waving his olive branch at the Nazi war machine.

Its easy to see how they might think that, but it is the premise of this piece that such a response ignores who the man really is, and further underestimates him intellectually and as an American, to the point of insult.american flag

An insult with impunity. Deeply undeserved, and dare I say it, dripping with spite and ignorance and quite frankly, sour grapes.

I read with interest the responses that Obama made to those who criticized his “Olive Branch” and called it appeasement.

“Senator Barack Obama responded sharply on Friday to attacks on his foreign policy, linking President Bush and Senator John McCain as partners in “the failed policies” of the past seven years and criticizing them for “hypocrisy, fear peddling, fear mongering.”

Confronting a major challenge to his world view, Mr. Obama tried to turn the tables on his critics, saying they were guilty of “bluster” and “dishonest, divisive” tactics. He cited a litany of what he called foreign policy blunders by the Bush administration and accused Mr. McCain, the presumed Republican nominee, of “doubling down” on them.” – New York Times

Of course here, he was responding to the extraordinary attack from McCain;

american-flag flag usa

And the belief that somehow communications and positions and willingness to sit down and have serious negotiations need to be done in a face to face fashion as Senator Obama wants to do, which then enhances the prestige of a nation that’s a sponsor of terrorists and is directly responsible for the deaths of brave young Americans, I think is an unacceptable position, and shows that Senator Obama does not have the knowledge, the experience, the background to make the kind of judgments that are necessary to preserve this nation’s security.”

But all this is, I think beside the point. I don’t think Obama is about appeasement. I don’t think either that there is any evidence that he is “soft” on terrorism. I don’t think that you can listen to the man, and walk out and say, “He doesn’t get it.”

It’s not really possible.

I find Mr. Obama, deeply American and more  deeply committed to American ideals than previous Presidents. I don’t think that this “olive branch” is anything more than that, a gesture of peace.

 

Just because Mr. Obama starts off by being magnanimous, rather than  confrontational, does not make him “Soft on Terror.”

I think, that, in line with his approach to torture, this is about gaining the moral high ground.  Read between the lines, the most powerful man in the world is offering an olive branch, he knows and appreciates the risks, and he probably knows too, that in many cases it will be rejected.

And when it is, he will hold all the moral currency he needs. He wants to build the American dream. He has the support, the means and the will.

 

He extends the hand of friendship.

 

Those who refuse it will learn, it is one thing to fight an aggressor, it is another thing entirely when you have spat in the face of friendship.

AMERICAN FLAG EAGLE

It is sad that President Bush would use a speech to the Knesset on the 6Oth anniversary of Israel’s independence to launch a false political attack. It is time to turn the page on eight years of policies that have strengthened Iran and failed to secure America or our ally Israel.”


”Instead of tough talk and no action, we need to do what Kennedy, Nixon and Reagan did and use all elements of American power — including tough, principled, and direct diplomacy — to pressure countries like Iran and Syria. George Bush knows that I have never supported engagement with terrorists, and the President’s extraordinary politicization of foreign policy and the politics of fear do nothing to secure the American people” – President Obama

Can you read between the lines?

I certainly can.

Lets hope Osama can too.

08
Jul
09

I Beg your Pardon Mr President but… or Something Else you should note about Mr Obama’s KowTow to Islam

Part 3 of 4 of my response to Mr Obama’s ridiculous speech to Islam was to be about ignoring history for the sake of appeasement, but I could not write it better, or more beautifully than this piece by Micheal Gerson, published in The New York Times:

obama pointing at youPRESIDENT OBAMA’S speech to the Islamic world was a groundbreaking event. Never before has a young, dynamic American president, beloved both by his countrymen and the nations of the world, extended so timely and eager a hand to a part of the globe that, recently, had seen fewer and fewer reasons to trust us or to wish us well.

As important, Mr. Obama did not mince words. Never before has a president gone over to the Arab world and broadcast its flaws so loudly and clearly: extremism, nuclear weapons programs and a faltering record in human rights, education and economic development — the Arab world gets no passing grades in any of these domains. Mr. Obama even found a moment to mention the plight of Egypt’s harassed Coptic community and to criticize the new wave of Holocaust deniers. And to show he was not playing favorites, he put the Israelis on notice: no more settlements in the occupied territories. He spoke about the suffering of Palestinians. This was no wilting olive branch.

And yet, for all the president’s talk of “a new beginning between the United States and Muslims around the world” and shared “principles of justice and progress,” neither he nor anyone around him, and certainly no one in the audience, bothered to notice one small detail missing from the speech: he forgot me.obama-puppet-02

The president never said a word about me. Or, for that matter, about any of the other 800,000 or so Jews born in the Middle East who fled the Arab and Muslim world or who were summarily expelled for being Jewish in the 20th century. With all his references to the history of Islam and to its (questionable) “proud tradition of tolerance” of other faiths, Mr. Obama never said anything about those Jews whose ancestors had been living in Arab lands long before the advent of Islam but were its first victims once rampant nationalism swept over the Arab world.

Nor did he bother to mention that with this flight and expulsion, Jewish assets were — let’s call it by its proper name — looted. Mr. Obama never mentioned the belongings I still own in Egypt and will never recover. My mother’s house, my father’s factory, our life in Egypt, our friends, our books, our cars, my bicycle. We are, each one of us, not just defined by the arrangement of protein molecules in our cells, but also by the things we call our own. Take away our things and something in us dies. Losing his wealth, his home, the life he had built, killed my father. He didn’t die right away; it took four decades of exile to finish him off.

NaziIslam2Mr. Obama had harsh things to say to the Arab world about its treatment of women. And he said much about America’s debt to Islam. But he failed to remind the Egyptians in his audience that until 50 years ago a strong and vibrant Jewish community thrived in their midst. Or that many of Egypt’s finest hospitals and other institutions were founded and financed by Jews. It is a shame that he did not remind the Egyptians in the audience of this, because, in most cases — and especially among those younger than 50 — their memory banks have been conveniently expunged of deadweight and guilt. They have no recollections of Jews.

In Alexandria, my birthplace and my home, all streets bearing Jewish names have been renamed. A few years ago, the Library of Alexandria put on display an Arabic translation of “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion,” perhaps the most anti-Semitic piece of prose ever written. Today, for the record, there are perhaps four Jews left in Alexandria.

When the last Jew dies, the temples and religious artifacts and books that were the property of what was once probably the wealthiest Jewish community on the Mediterranean will go to the Egyptian government — not to me, or to my children, or to any of the numberless descendants of Egyptian Jews.

american-flag-eagle_~bxp48315

It is strange that our president, a man so versed in history and so committed to the truth, should have omitted mentioning the Jews of Egypt. He either forgot, or just didn’t know, or just thought it wasn’t expedient or appropriate for this venue. But for him to speak in Cairo of a shared effort “to find common ground … and to respect the dignity of all human beings” without mentioning people in my position would be like his speaking to the residents of Berlin about the future of Germany and forgetting to mention a small detail called World War II

segev-600

04
Jul
09

The Mythology behind Obama’a Engagement with Islam or Why Tolerating intolerance is not a form of tolerance.

Part 2 of 4 on Obama’s speech in Cairo

islamicI’ve come here to Cairo to seek a new beginning between the United States and Muslims around the world, one based on mutual interest and mutual respect, and one based upon the truth that America and Islam are not exclusive and need not be in competition. Instead, they overlap, and share common principles — principles of justice and progress; tolerance and the dignity of all human beings – President Obama.

These were the words that Obama delivered at Cairo, words which on the surface seem reasonable and fair. Words that present succinctly and directly, just what Obama wanted to say to something he called “the Muslim world.”  Words that, for lack of better words, symbolize the Obama attempt to get the USA, a nation, to engage with an idea.

For, dear reader, Islam is just that, nothing more and nothing less, an idea. Just like existentialism, individuality, freedom and fascism, ideas all. Now whilst the USA represents an Idea, and in broad strokes you could say that the USA is an idea, Obama went not as a philosopher, but as a President. As President of a nation, to a far away country, to talk to people who have an idea, to suggest that the USA was ready to engage with that idea.

It’s a first for any real leader, this notion of engaging ideas, and it’s certainly a first for global politics. EurabiaMapThe very notion is so far reaching and deeply flawed that it almost beggars belief. The question that needs to be asked, is since when did Nations engage with ideologies on an individual basis ?

Twice, actually !

With two ideas, namely Communism and National Socialism (The German variety).

However, there is a distinct difference between Obama seeking dialogue with the Mullah and Ayatollahs and Nixon making nice with the Chinese and too, with Chamberlain appeasing the goose stepping lunatics of Nazi Germany and their Italian collaborators.

Our previous engagement with opposing ideology on world stage politics was between nations who held different ideology for the sake of peace. Obama has gone to engage with the idea itself.

Breathtaking actually. Reagan never spoke of common values with communism, and Chamberlain never suggested that democracy and fascism overlapped. Unlike Obama who suggests that Secular states share values with Fascist Theocracies, and even worse that in fact the ideologies overlap.

To suggest that secular democracy shares values with Islam because they both espouse progress is like saying that Pedophiles and Buddhists share values because they both like to eat three meals a day. It might be true, but it’s irrelevant. What Mr. Obama ignores is that  all ideologies share some values, its where they differ that matters, and when it comes to Islam and Secular States on substantive ideas and values, there is no common ground, where it counts.

ittehad2Never mind the blatant dishonesty of claiming that Islam believes in the dignity of Human beings in the same way as the US constitution. This to an ideology that dresses its women in dustbin bags and thrives on stoning adulteresses and dismembering thieves and so on and so forth.

Mr. Obama’s justification for this embracing nonsense is interesting, as far as he is concerned, the vast majority of Islam have been held hostage by what he calls “Violent extremists” who he suggests “have exploited these tensions in a small but potent minority of Muslims.”

He goes further to say that as a result of this tiny band of Muslim extremists and the twin effects of what he calls “the sweeping change brought by modernity and globalization”
 many Muslims have been misled into believing that the West is hostile to Islamic traditions.

Funny that.

The truth is that the ideology of the west, flies in the face of many ideologies that exist within its borders. The foundations of science fly in the face of the very Christian fundamentalists who populate large parts of the United States. The values of a society that allow abortion which is in direct conflict of the Roman Catholic Church, and yet no speeches in Rome to pacify the Vatican.

Perhaps that’s because the Vatican has not sent any priests into coffee shops wearing payloads of explosives ?

gbhitler

What Mr. Obama is skirting here is the very big elephant in the room. Every time the envoys of Islam blow something to hell in the name of anything from Palestine to Pornography, we get told, it’s just a small band of extremists.

Rubbish.

Where do extremists with camels in caves of desert nations get satellite phones, bombs, arms and most importantly money ? The simple convenience of throwing your hands up in the air and condemning these actions, all the while financially supporting and hiding and enabling global terror, justified by religious rights is ridiculous.

In any event, if it’s truly just a small band of people giving Islam a bad name, why then does the Muslim world not crack down on it .

Even worse, why fly to Cairo to explain to Muslims what they already know ?

And too, why talk to the Muslim world about peace and co-operation if they are already peaceful and co-operating ?

Lets get Obama to run through the streets of Tehran or Dubai in his underwear to gauge this so called tolerance. Hell, never mind Obama, lets get Britney Spears to perform in downtown anywhere in the world of Islamofascism.

Ladies and gentleman, I don’t want to flog a dead horse, but when Islam starts letting its populations watch Will and Grace, then I’ll consider the idea that it’s just a small band of extremists we face.

The simple truth is that  Secular democracy cannot engage with religious ideology, it allows them to exist, they in turn must do the same, even if fundamentally they have opposing values.

What makes this Cairo speech so pathetic is that it was delivered with a semantic twist of titanic proportions, the “Muslim World” is not in the Middle East. Obama was not talking to Muslims, he was talking to Islamofacists, or if you like, plain old fascists.

If he had wanted to talk to Muslims, he should have gone to the Pacific Rim, but then again, the Islamofascists are blowing them up too.

Not too many bomb threats from Bali.

Perhaps then there is some truth in the distinction between Muslims and “Extreme Muslims”, perhaps it should be better phrased, for lets face it, there is no Jihad from Indonesia, and perhaps we should call a spade a spade?

mufti_inspecting2

The long relationship between Islam and Nazis is illustrated by this image of the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem inspecting Nazi Troops

 

Arab national fascism or Islamofascim.

That’s whom Obama was talking to.

So why was he behaving like Chamberlain?




Statistics

  • 57,853 readers